A comparison of New Relic and Scandock on how monitoring is set up, how causes are found, setup steps and more.
As of November 3, 2026
New Relic is a monitoring platform that covers APM, infrastructure, logs and more. For databases, the APM Databases page shows query time as seen from your app, and the PostgreSQL and MySQL integrations (via the infrastructure agent) show database-side metrics and query performance.
Scandock is a service focused on database monitoring. AI reads your tables and data to decide what to watch, and when something is off, it investigates the cause before telling you.
Both help you notice database problems, but in New Relic people write the monitoring conditions and people read the screens to find the cause. In Scandock, AI does both. This page puts real screens from both side by side to show the difference.
In short
If you want database monitoring and investigation handled for you, we recommend Scandock.
AI decides what to monitor, and when something is off, it investigates the cause and reports with evidence. You start by adding a connection string, and it also watches business data such as orders and payments. New Relic is enough if you need your app and database together with APM at the center, and have people in-house who write and keep tuning monitoring conditions.
| Item | New Relic | Scandock |
|---|---|---|
| Designing monitors | You write alert conditions (queries) | AI reads your tables and data and decides |
| Detecting anomalies | You choose static, anomaly or outlier thresholds and set sensitivity and duration | AI judges from trends and past outcomes |
| Finding the cause | You read the Databases page and slow query lists | AI runs queries to investigate and reports with evidence |
| Remediation | Done by people | Registered actions run after your approval |
| Setup | Infrastructure agent and integration, a monitoring user, extensions | Add a connection string |
| Business data | Write custom query config yourself | AI also watches orders, failed payments and more |
| Scope | Covers APM, infrastructure, logs and more | Focused on databases |
| Price | Based on users and data volume (1 user and 100 GB/month free) | From ¥29,800/month (3 databases, 5 users) |
In New Relic, each alert condition uses a query to pick the data, and you choose static, anomaly or outlier thresholds. Even with anomaly detection, a person decides how many standard deviations and for how many minutes should trigger an alert, and how to split warning and critical levels. To watch business data, you also write custom query config yourself. It takes someone who knows which data matters to the business and keeps tuning the conditions.

In Scandock, AI reads your tables and data and sets up monitors such as payment outcomes, failures by payment method, incoming orders and backed-up shipping jobs. Nobody has to write conditions or set thresholds. AI judges anomalies from trends, marks them as fired, and moves straight on to investigating the cause.

In New Relic, the APM Databases page shows the most time-consuming database operations and trends in query time and throughput per database. From there you open the slow query list to see which queries took how long. With the PostgreSQL or MySQL integration, you also get dashboards for query performance and wait events from the database side. Deciding which screen to check and pinning down the cause is up to people.


In Scandock, when AI notices an anomaly, it investigates with read-only queries, summarizes what is happening with evidence, and sends it to Slack or email with a suggested fix. Nobody has to dig through screens. You read the result and decide whether to approve the fix.

Compared for a self-hosted PostgreSQL database on Linux, including query performance monitoring.
PostgreSQL 12 or later is required. To use the APM Databases page, you also install an APM agent in your app.
Scandock installs nothing on the database server and changes no database settings. Private databases connect through Cloudflare Tunnel.
New Relic is priced by the number of people using the screens (full platform users) and the amount of data ingested, not by the number of databases. So this compares cost by number of users. Each Scandock plan has a user limit: up to 5 on Starter and up to 20 on Business.
| Users | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New Relic (full platform users) | 1,500 | 16,350 | 31,200 | 46,050 | 60,900 | 376,920 | 439,740 | 502,560 | 565,380 | 628,200 |
| Scandock | 29,800 | 29,800 | 29,800 | 29,800 | 29,800 | 79,800 | 79,800 | 79,800 | 79,800 | 79,800 |
Amounts are monthly, in yen, excluding tax.
Monitoring databases with New Relic takes people's time: writing conditions, tuning sensitivity and reading screens at every incident. Those hours never show up on the price list. With Scandock, AI designs the monitoring, investigates the cause, reports with evidence, and runs fixes once you approve them. It is free for 14 days and starts watching as soon as you add a connection string. Give Scandock a try.
New Relic pricing, setup steps and screenshots were checked on its official site on November 3, 2026. Prices are the US dollar list prices on the English pricing page. See the official site for the latest. New Relic is a trademark of New Relic, Inc.